The Dark Ages Return to South Africa

August 20, 2010
The Dark Ages Return to’

 South Africa

‘This is the worst attack on press freedom I’ve seen in my career.’

 

By

R.W. JOHNSON

Cape Town, South Africa

Sourced from: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704554104575434863473039270.html?mod=WSJ_article_related#articleTabs%3Darticle

Tags (key words): South Africa, press freedom, censorship, journalists, RW Johnson, Raymond Louw

“This is worse than anything under apartheid,” says Raymond Louw. “The powers the government is taking to curb the press are far wider now and the powers given to the SS Minister—the Minister for State Security—are far greater.”

Mr. Louw is something of a South African institution. He was the news editor of the country’s leading anti-apartheid newspaper, the Rand Daily Mail, at the height of apartheid and then edited the paper for 11 years in the teeth of government hostility. Now 84, he still edits a press digest, Southern African Report, and plays a leading role in the national Editors Forum and the Freedom of Expression Institute. So when he calls the government’s recent media laws “the worst attack on press freedom I’ve seen in my career,” he knows whereof he speaks.

The ruling African National Congress (ANC) has never understood a free press. In exile its publications were all pure examples of Soviet journalism with no room for difference of opinion or human interest, let alone humor. They never breathed a word about the party’s factions or the fact that some leaders were car thieves and drug dealers and some were drunks.

Once the ANC came to power in 1994 it avowedly aimed to create a social and cultural hegemony over civil society and to this end attempted to recruit the press. Under Nelson Mandela this worked largely because the old man enjoyed enormous authority and popularity, to which the press paid court. This deference, backed now by a sense of threat as well as reward, continued for several years under Thabo Mbeki.

But as more and more things began to go wrong in the country—power cuts, Mr. Mbeki’s AIDS denialism, increasing corruption—the press, to Mr. Mbeki’s fury, began to speak out. By then Mr. Mbeki was locked in a power struggle with Jacob Zuma for control of the ANC. The press, realizing this was its moment, snapped its leash and escaped its kennel. One result is that the ANC hegemony lies in ruins. The media mock the president and expose the high-living and corruption of his ministers.

Appalled by this, the Zuma-ites, straight after last year’s election, rushed through a bill allowing a parliamentary majority (that is to say themselves) to appoint and dismiss the board of the South African Broadcasting Cooperation (SABC), which accounts for 40% of the radio audience and 70% of the television audience. Another bill now under discussion would allow the government to control SABC finances and issue directives to its board.

Meanwhile the SABC has been instructed to carry no more interviews with Mr. Mbeki since these “undermine” the Zuma government. ANC control of the SABC has been absolute for years but it is now a matter of ensuring that the right ANC faction has control.

The row with the press began with complaints by ministers of the ruling African National Congress about media reports detailing their exuberant life styles in five-star hotels and restaurants at taxpayer expense. One of the chief high-livers and complainants was Blade Nzimande, the Communist Party leader who is minister for higher education. An avalanche of other reports detailed the now almost open corruption at ministerial level, usually via the allocation of state contracts to favored bidders who then pay backhanders.

Mr. Zuma, for his part, is still resentful about frequent press allegations of corruption directed against himself, together with embarrassing reports about his multitudinous wives, children and mistresses. He has filed lawsuits against many journalists and, particularly, cartoonists.

As a result, the government plans a “Protection of Personal Information Bill,” which would only allow reporting about people’s personal lives with their consent. Heavy penalties would thus prevent any more reporting of Mr. Nizimande’s wine-bibbing or of illegitimate children born to President Zuma’s mistresses.

This is accompanied by a new “Information Bill” proposal, which would impose penalties of up to 25 years in jail for reporting about anything the government declares to be a matter of national interest, itself defined broadly to include anything which may be for the advancement of the public good. On top of that the government plans a special Media Tribunal to adjudicate complaints against the press and which would have the power to jail journalists and impose fines that could force the closure of newspapers.

Most of these changes would appear to be unconstitutional. But there is little confidence that the Constitutional Court will stand up to the government, for the ANC has long appointed its patsies to the bench.

The media, supported by a host of international bodies, are united in furious defence of their freedoms. It will be a matter of great gravity if press freedom is extinguished here in South Africa, for this is Africa’s leading state.

Little is heard today of the African renaissance promised by Thabo Mbeki when he was president. But no one is prepared for a return to the dark ages.

Mr. Johnson is a writer living in South Africa.

 

Sourced from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704554104575434863473039270.html?mod=WSJ_article_related#articleTabs%3Darticle

 

Shared by Craig Lock (‘’just another battler for freedom of the press’’)

The various books that Craig “felt inspired to write”are available at:
http://www.creativekiwis.com/books.html#craig and www.lulu.com/craiglock

PS

Don”t worry about the world ending today…
its already tomorrow in little scenic and tranquil New Zealand

 

 

"live with intention, ...

March 20, 2012

Reblogged from http://newbooksbycraiglock.wordpress.com:

“live with intention,

walk to the edge

listen hard

practice wellness

play with abandon

laugh (often and especially at yourself)

choose your life path with no regrets

continue to learn

appreciate your friends

treat others with respect (and especially their right to hold certain beliefs)

do what you love (then you’ll never have to do a day’s work in your life)

Read more… 19 more words

War reporter Marie Colvin laid to rest

March 18, 2012

War reporter Marie Colvin laid to rest

 

From http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/8434053/war-reporter-marie-colvin-laid-to-rest

Tags: Brave reporters and journalist, Marie Colvin, Syria

Hundreds of people gathered near New York City at the funeral of famed American war correspondent Marie Colvin, who was killed while covering the uprising in Syria.

The funeral, followed by a private cremation ceremony, was held in Oyster Bay, a quiet Long Island community close to where Colvin grew up before becoming a globe-trotting reporter for Britain’s Sunday Times.

Mourners joining Colvin’s mother Rosemarie and her family on Monday included media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, owner of the Sunday Times, and John Witherow, editor of the British paper that Colvin joined in 1985.

The eulogy paid tribute to a woman who “trusted life” and “had a passion for her work”.

“Blessed are you Mary for your courage to be a voice to the voiceless,” a priest said, underlining the huge risks Colvin took to deliver on her passion.

Another prayer was said “for the many people who live in hunger and violence, especially those who live in Syria”.

Afterwards, the rose-strewn coffin was carried out of the church. A “beautiful service”, Murdoch said.

Witherow, meanwhile, recalled how hard it had been to get Colvin’s body out of the Syrian town of Homs, which for days after her death remained a battleground.

“It took one week and involved a tremendous amount of diplomacy,” he said, praising a journalist who “will be an inspiration” for colleagues.

Friends and family had paid their last respects over the weekend at a wake held at an Oyster Bay funeral home.

Colvin, 56, was a great survivor in the harsh world of war reporting, covering conflicts from Chechnya to the Arab Spring.

But she was unable to escape in the besieged city of Homs on February 22 when Syrian government rockets hit the house where she was staying along with other Western journalists.

She and French photographer Remi Ochlik were killed, while a British photographer and a French reporter were wounded.

“Marie Colvin will always be in the hearts of each and every Syrian wherever they are,” wrote a mourner named Reem Faraj on the funeral home website.

“She was and will always be one of the heroes who made the cries of Syrians and other victims in the world be heard. The memories of those heroes will never die.”

“Marie, you were the bravest person I know and I don’t think you realised what an inspiration you were to us other women reporters,” added fellow Sunday Times journalist Christina Lamb. “We will miss you. Now I’ve met your mum i know where you got it from.”

Malek Jandali, a Syrian-American attending the funeral, said he wanted to salute a “beautiful soul, a courageous woman who sacrificed her life to expose the brutality of the Syrian regime”.

“We plan to have a square or a street for her in Homs,” he said.

There were also mourners from the Tamil community, which remembers Colvin for her reporting on the war in Sri Lanka, where she lost an eye in 2001, forcing her to wear an eye patch.

“She was an incredible voice for the Tamil people,” said Visuvanathan Rudrakamuran, who said he was an exiled Tamil official.

Colvin’s relatives – including her mother, two brothers and two sisters – are seeking money for the Marie Colvin Fund, which will “direct donations to charitable and educational organisations that reflect Marie’s lifelong dedication to humanitarian aid, human rights, journalism and education”.

The fund’s website is http://mariecolvin.org.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/8434053/war-reporter-marie-colvin-laid-to-rest

 

You can cut down the flower, but nothing can stop the coming of the spring.”

“Power is meaningless, when you are an enemy of the people.”

Srebrenica Ghosts Come Back to Haunt Syrian Towns

March 15, 2012

Reblogged from Working, Striving towards a more Peaceful World:

Srebrenica Ghosts Come Back to Haunt Syrian Towns

By Robert Fisk

From http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-is-homs-an-echo-of-what-happened-in-srebrenica-7542448.html

No entry to the International Red Cross. Not yet. Maybe in a few days, when the area has been secured. Men and boys separated from the women and children. Streams of refugees. Women, children, the old, few males. Stories of men being loaded on to trucks and taken away.

Read more… 1,083 more words

Homs: inside the city at the heart of Syria’s rebellion

December 6, 2011

Homs: inside the city at the heart of Syria’s rebellion

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/19/homs-syria-rebellion-assad

 

A world of guarded conversations and shadowy rumours amid the funereal silence of a military lockdown

 

Syrian soldiers guarding the streets of Homs earlier this month. Photograph: Yin Bogu/Xinhua Press/Corbis

On Thursday morning, I woke up in Homs, the city labelled by the international media as the “capital of the Syrian revolution”.

Homs has been in more or less open revolt since at least April, but in recent weeks what is going on here has acquired ominous new significance. Facing the full force of a crackdown on their demonstrations by the Syrian army and police, at least some of the city’s residents have taken up arms, either to defend themselves and their communities or to go on the attack.

Outside Syria and in the international media, the siege has become a cause célèbre. But events here show not only the courage and the forbearance of its citizens, but also the traps that lie in wait for an unhappy people suppressed by a brutal military crackdown.

I was lucky to get here. It’s not quite true that all foreign journalists are banned from Syria, but it was extremely difficult to get in, even before the uprising, and those who succeed are carefully shepherded around. It took me two journeys back and forth from Beirut even to get across the border into Damascus.

After a few days there, I went to the bus station and bought a ticket to Homs. A policeman was on hand to check foreign passports, but fortunately he didn’t bother to check mine carefully – it clearly indicates, by means of a Syrian government stamp, that I am a journalist.

My second stroke of luck was to have been befriended by an 18-year-old boy as we boarded the bus. An engineering student on his way back home to Homs, he was concerned that here was an idiotic tourist about to get himself into trouble. “There are no tourists in Homs,” he told me, looking serious. “My mother and father are afraid to go out. Yesterday my sister saw a body in the street, and she’s been crying ever since.”

On arrival, he ushered me past any prying eyes and directly into a taxi, going out of his way to take me straight to a hotel in the city centre. The city centre is the only safe place, he said.

Homs is a city of more than half a million people in the heart of the country. It’s where Syrians go to escape the hustle of Damascus, to let their hair down in its cafes and restaurants, or watch football: Homs boasts two football teams, as well as a museum where tourists can read about the famous battles that were fought here.

Nowadays it’s fighting another battle: the city is under total military lockdown. The hotel I’ve been taken to overlooks the main square and its now infamous clock tower, where the Syrian army apparently ran amok and gunned down peaceful demonstrators in April.

Since then, the violence has moved into the residential areas, and into the shadows. In the weeks before my arrival the death rate rose, making it the most violent place in the country.

On the road into the city, we passed at least 50 military vehicles that were going in the same general direction: a convoy of long green buses, lorries carrying munitions, and trucks with weary-looking soldiers sitting in the back, smoking and sleeping.

There were no tanks, but on one lorry was mounted what looked like a huge gun. Near Homs I saw one tank sitting by the side of the road, guarding a broad, freshly dug ditch about 100 yards long by the side of the highway. It might have been a trench.

Here in the city centre, however, all is quiet. Funereal. The battles between the Syrian army, the demonstrators and unknown armed groups take place just a mile or two away from here in densely packed residential areas like Baba Amr; another flashpoint, the hotel manager tells me, is Bab al-Sebaa, just a few hundred yards up the road.

He looks at me quizzically, but doesn’t ask questions – he’s happy to have a customer, whoever I am. The hotel covers four spacious floors, but tonight I’ll be the only guest. Before the disturbances there were 75 staff here, but now there are only three during the day and one in the evening.

In my luxury business suite a huge cockroach is circling through the air in the bathroom; when I turn on the TV, it sizzles at the socket and then goes quiet. I was promised a room without a street window, just in case. But there’s no hot water, so I ask to be moved to another suite. This, too, has no hot water; it will be working very soon, he assures me.

I say I’m going to get some food, but the manager is gently solicitous. I shouldn’t really go out, he says – I can eat at the hotel. When I tell him I need to stretch my legs, he points out the window at a single shopping street. Walk down there, he says, but don’t go too far and don’t be too long. Trouble is only a few hundred yards away: a short walk in the other direction, and you enter Bab al-Sebaa.

As I walk through the retail district, people are emerging from government offices and there are signs of normality returning to the city; at a functioning street market, some business is being done. Across the road from the main square, a skinny man in a long leather jacket is staring around and barks instructions to another man.

People hurry along the street and don’t idle, going about their business under the gaze of authority. And even here, everyone shuts up shop in the afternoon and scurries home.

In an electronics showroom, beneath a huge poster of President Bashar al-Assad and his father, I get chatting to a young man of about 20; he seems prosperous, starting off the conversation by talking about his expensive car. He’s also a little guarded, suspicious of my interest. “Why did you come here? By accident? How did you get in? There are checkpoints. Didn’t you know that the army are here, that there’s fighting?”

Who are they fighting, I ask him – terrorists? “No. The people.” Whose side you are you on, I ask. Can you say? There are two other people in the shop; he grins and looks at the floor. “No,” he says, making a show of not answering. “I don’t want to say.”

There have been rumours of kidnaps, he says – paramilitaries from the president’s own Shia Alawite sect who tell drivers to go down a certain road and then kidnap or kill you. You can avoid getting hurt if you stay at home all evening, but it’s no life. “If this keeps up I’m going to emigrate,” he says. “Maybe to Australia, until things get better.”

A friend of his was arrested yesterday after a demonstration at nearby Kalamoon University, between here and Damascus – one of the jewels of Assad’s fitful programme of economic modernisation. “The police were using electrical prods,” he says.

Maybe I could take a taxi to look around the city, I ask. Don’t do that, he says – if the driver is a friend of the government he will take you to their offices, and you’ll be arrested for being a journalist. I hadn’t told him that I was a journalist. I don’t want to be arrested, I say: I have a plane to catch. He turns a little testy. “It’s OK for you,” he says. “All that will happen to you is that you’ll be deported.”

Have you seen the tanks, he asks. Not in the town centre, I say. There are some parked just a few streets away, he says; I’d take you, but the soldiers might see you if you get too close. After the Arab League decision to suspend Syria three days ago, they painted them blue. “It was their way of saying the tanks aren’t really tanks any more.” He laughs at the innocence of it.

Amazingly there are still sporadic demonstrations throughout the city during the day. In one cafe I walk into, two workers are leaning out the window as though listening for something – for a moment they thought they could hear slogans and chanting, one of them says, but it might have been something else.

On the same street I find a fancy patisserie where a well-dressed manager in his 30s is doing very little. When the other customer in the shop shuffles off, he becomes much more talkative, smiling at me, but also deadly serious.

“There are 5,000 killed here in the last six months,” he says, a figure much higher than official estimates. “There is no water, gas or electricity for most people here.” Now I know why my hotel has no hot water.

“Unesco send things here, but this is no good. We can’t go on like this.” He pats an imaginary child. “They are killing little children.”

Why did I come here, he wants to know. Aleppo is safe, he says: there are lots of safe places. Should the president go? “How can he stay,” he says, rolling his eyes, “after all this killing?” He knows this much: “I want my freedom.”

Does he support the Arab League’s suspension of Syria? He nods. Does he say these things to people?” “No,” he says, as if the answer should be obvious, and runs his index finger across his throat.

His boss, a small businessman who lives outside Homs, arrives and pulls down the shop’s shutters. Nobody is buying anything, and it’s getting dark. For the next few hours, over leaf tea and cake, we talk.

The businessman’s mobile phone keeps interrupting us, with friends chiding him for even going to Homs. When he’s here he doesn’t leave the shop, he says – just comes and goes.

On the television we switch between Syrian state TV and al-Jazeera. The former is showing a demonstration of 300,000 people in Damascus in support of the president. The shop manager is quieter now, but both my companions agree that the president can still muster a measure of support for his ability to hold the country together, even if not in Homs.

Al-Jazeera is showing grainy images on mobile phones of detainees being brutalised by soldiers, while Syrian state television is showing the bound, bloodied bodies of men it says were assassinated by terrorists in Homs. All of this must be happening just a mile or two away, but no one really knows who is doing what to whom.

“Eleven killed today in Homs,” chuckles the businessman blackly, reading the statistic from a TV channel. “Homs is now the big problem.”

It doesn’t help that Syria is a police state. In the vacuum, rumours multiply. As we eat our cake, the businessman treats us to some of them. There is a story, he says, that al-Jazeera is paying people $20,000 for photos taken on their mobile phone. The self-styled Free Syrian Army, an outfit that seems to be on the rise, and which is posting a lot of video on the internet, might be out there fighting, and if so the best of luck to them – on balance, however, he thinks that they’re an illusion puffed up by Turkey. It’s said that both the government and the opposition are paying people to attend their demonstrations in Damascus. And he’s heard it on good authority that the police are pretending that drug dealers and criminals are demonstrators; after all, he says, that way they’re “outside the law” and can simply be killed.

“All the conspiracies are true,” says the businessman. “Turkey and Qatar and the Saudis have their own axes to grind, and reasons to weaken Syria; they’re playing with us.

“Arabs,” he continues, “what have they done for us? They’re oh so concerned about us, but less keen when it comes to giving us visas to their countries.”

The shop manager agrees, but maintains he’s still proud to be Arab. Both can agree that they’re Syrian above all else. Nato gets no more than a snort; no Syrian, says the businessman, wants another Iraq. He doesn’t even want another Libya.

Syria is very far from being another Iraq – at least for the moment. From what little I saw, travelling back and forth between Damascus and Homs, the talk of “civil war” is premature and a little overheated. Most of Damascus is carrying on very much as normal, even if its residents are a little more hushed and fearful than usual. It’s in the capital’s suburbs – places such as Douma and Harasta, where huge swaths of the country’s neglected, humiliated poor live – that the demonstrations after Friday prayers occur.

But what’s embarrassing for the authorities about Homs, says the businessman, is that here the violence is taking place within the confines of the city itself; that’s why they’re cracking down so hard.

Taking pictures on your mobile phone can be enough to invite trouble. After people were gunned down in the huge demonstration at the clock tower in April, he says, Sana, the Syrian news agency, brought crowds and people armed with cameraphones to the main square to show that life was getting back to normal. But, according to the businessman, a police sniper saw the cameraphone snappers and opened fire. A few people were hurt. “Mistakes have been made,” he says, with another gallows chuckle.

He thinks that the president is a smart and decent man, undermined by shadowy forces within his own security establishment. “He didn’t sleep for three days after some of the killings, a friend of mine who knows told me.” But should the president stay in power and try to reform the system? “Too little, too late,” he says, with a flick of the wrist. “Go.”

The businessman is sleeping above the shop tonight, and the shop manager will walk the short distance home as usual. But he’s not happy about it: he’s had friends who have been hit by stray bullets.

Why not get a taxi, I ask. It’s becoming difficult, he says. Both my companions are Sunni, and both speak of discrimination against Sunnis in the country at large, but the shop manager says that taxi drivers are beginning only to pick up passengers from their own religious affiliation; the city itself, he says, is beginning to fragment along doctrinal lines. The businessman is not sure he agrees.

I walk back the 100 yards to the hotel with the shop manager and bid him goodnight. The hotel rooms are all unlocked and empty, so I walk around the place and spy on the streets down below. In the middle of a city of hundreds of thousands of people, there’s not a sound. Occasionally a few white army pickup trucks zoom up, and the soldiers jump out and investigate a building.

I sit a while with the hotel manager in the bar area. We look out, and see what at first looks like a man carrying a gun ambling down the street. Then we realise it’s an old woman carrying a bag. “She must be mad,” he says.

We retire to bed. During the night there’s the odd crackle of gunfire, and a small explosion, but nothing else.

In the morning I go out walking again and pay another visit to the electronics showroom. I hand over some money for internet access, but it doesn’t work. “Oh, that happens a lot,” the man says. “They shut it down, usually for only a couple of hours at a stretch. And especially on Thursday – the day before prayers.”

I walk a bit further, and meet the shop manager again; we’re walking in the same direction, towards the clock tower, where all that remains of the April demonstration is a single graffito in Arabic.

“There were 70,000 people here,” he says, “and the police were doing this”: he mimics the act of shooting from a machine gun. I bid him goodbye, afraid that he might draw attention; a few hundred yards away, two soldiers with Kalashnikovs are guarding a government building.

After another cursory attempt to walk up and down the few roads open to me, pretending to be a shopper, I give up. As a foreigner, I stick out like a sore thumb; not wanting to be arrested and have my notes taken, I return to my hotel room and pace up and down until it’s time to leave. In a way, it’s what the residents of Homs have been doing for the last seven months, only in much more gruelling conditions.

I want to get out of this hothouse, as quickly and as efficiently as possible. The businessman is going to Damascus, and offers to take me with him. As we go, we pass through the central square, the scene of many attacks. Hardly anyone is around, not even many soldiers; both sides are preparing for what might happen tomorrow, after prayers.

Turrets made out of sandbags are built up on one side of the road, where soldiers have dug themselves in. As we drive, the businessman confides that he, too, plans to emigrate – only for a few years, until things have got better.

Most people here, however, can’t afford to leave, even if they wanted to. Before we got into the car I went back into the pâtisserie shop one last time to buy some cake. The manager had a glint in his eye, and he said goodbye with a welcome. “Welcome to Syria,” he said, smiling his enigmatic smile. “Welcome to Homs.”

COURSE OF THE CONFLICT

23 February Tensions mount in Syrian capital of Damascus after a 2,000-strong sit-in outside the Libyan embassy is violently dispersed by police.

23 March Reports of police firing on crowds in Deraa, killing several after six days of protests. Thousands take to the streets for the funerals of those killed, chanting ‘Syria, freedom!’

29 March Assad sacks his cabinet and hints at sweeping reforms.

22 April Assad lifts 42 years of ‘emergency rule’; thousands march in cities and towns across the country. Security forces loyal to Assad kill at least 100 protesters in bloodiest day yet.

28 April Hundreds of ruling Ba’ath party MPs resign as death toll passes 500.

16 June Reports of 120 members of security forces being killed in an attack in Jisr al-Shughour after a split in their ranks.

31 July Tanks storm city of Hama, ending a month-long siege. At least 80 are killed.

15 September Opposition activists in Istanbul launch Syrian National Council.

4 October Russia and China veto a UN Security Council resolution condemning Syria.

7 October Syria reports 1,100 members of the security forces have died.

8 November Despite agreeing to an Arab League plan for army withdrawal, the military continues its campaign against activists in Homs. The UN estimates that more than 3,500 people have been killed since the uprising began.

12 November The Arab League suspends Syria’s membership.

16 November The Free Syrian Army, set up by deserters and led by Colonel Riad al-Asaad, attacks military targets.

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/19/homs-syria-rebellion-assad

“Power is worth nothing, while you stand as an enemy to the people.”

“You can cut down the flower, but nothing can stop the coming of the spring.”

 

“It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.”

Robert Francis Kennedy quotes ( U.S. attorney general and adviser, 1925-1968)

 

 

SINISTER SILENCE OF A CITY BESIEGED : Intrepid Journey to Syrian City of Fear

December 5, 2011

SINISTER SILENCE OF A CITY BESIEGED

Intrepid Journey to Syrian City of Fear

A brave young resident helps a journalist get into perilous Homs

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

From http://www.examiner.ie/features/sinister-silence-of-a-city-besieged-175459.html

Tags:  Syria, Homs, oppression, repression, James Harkin, brave journalists and reporters

 

James Harkin is one of the few non-Syrians to get into Homs, the epicentre of the Syrian uprising, and has witnessed the terror and the violence of the military lockdown

IT IS an abrupt twist to a conversation as I settle into my seat on the bus from Damascus to Homs: an 18-year-old man tells me in no uncertain terms to get off, to leave the bus.

We’ve known each other just five minutes, Mohammed and I, after he introduced himself while we were loading our luggage into the hold of the bus. I’d invited him to sit beside me at the back. With his shock of curly black hair zipped up in the hood of a stripy cardigan, he looked like the lead singer of a retro boy band.

“But why? Why do you want to go to Homs?” he asks again and again. Oh, I don’t know, I say: I’m touring around. This spooks Mohammed, as well it should: Homs, in recent weeks, has become a place of immense peril, the epicentre of an increasingly violent uprising against the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

I don’t want to tell Mohammed I’m a journalist. Journalists are, as a general rule, barred from entering Syria, and definitely not allowed to wander around unsupervised.

“Tourists in Homs? There are none,” he says. He looks at me quizzically for a few moments, as if he’s trying to get the measure of me: what kind of Western tourist would be so idiotic as to park himself on the bus to Homs? And then, just as the bus revs its engines, his tone becomes more urgent.

“I fear for you, I want you to get off the bus. Get off.” It’s as if he’s only just realised that I must be mad — or a journalist. People are beginning to stare. Almost everyone else on the bus is an old man; maybe young men know better than to take the bus to Homs. The bus pulls away and I shrug my shoulders, but Mohammed is deadly serious. “You can still get off. Get off now.”

For the next two hours we talk. Perhaps it’s because I’m a foreigner, Mohammed is mighty voluble. He’s an engineering student from Homs, but since the antigovernment demonstrations began, he hasn’t been able to attend college in the city. Homs, where he lives, is home to just over a million people, right in the heartland of Syria.

Homs is where Syrians go to flee the bustle of Damascus and relax in its cafes and restaurants and to watch soccer (Homs boasts two popular teams, Al-Karamah and Al-Wathba). Not anymore: since March, when its people rose up to protest against economic injustice and demand more political freedom, and its armed forces replied with guns and repression, the city has been under a fierce siege.

Most of the city is under total military lockdown, Mohammed tells me. No one can go out; everyone stays at home. “There are tanks in the streets where I live. You can’t really walk around; it’s dangerous.”

His father is a headmaster in a local school, but even he hasn’t been able to go out to work. Everyone knows someone who’s been killed or injured in his area.

“Yesterday, my sister saw a body in the street, and she’s been crying ever since.” Does he mean perilous districts such as Baba Amr, I ask, places from where gruesome but unverified clips of bombed buildings and dead bodies have been turning up on YouTube? Mohammed becomes insistent, frustrated with his inability to get the message across: “No, not just there. It’s everywhere. You will see.”

I did see — and hear. Later that day, in Homs, I chatted with the manager of a pastry shop who, when he was sure he was out of the earshot of others, told me he believed as many as 5,000 people had been killed in the city in the last six months.

There, chillingly, he played out the act of firing a machine gun into imaginary crowds. Rat-tat-tat-tat-tat. Since the demonstrators were ejected from the main square, the battles between them, the army and unknown armed groups have fanned out into different areas within the city limits. Some residents of Homs have taken up arms, either to defend themselves and their communities against the army and the police, or to go on the attack. Amid reports of growing sectarian tension between Sunnis and Alawites, an unorthodox branch of Shiites, the conflict has grown more shadowy and difficult to fathom. The only thing people know for sure is that more bodies are found on the streets every day.

The living stay at home. Everyone sits tight and waits. Many homes in the city are without gas, electricity or hot water. Even in the city centre, where I stay, there is no hot water to be found. In the morning, people walk around, as if stretching their legs after their hours of being cooped up indoors. But the claustrophobia, the feeling of everyone watching and being watched, is intense.

Whenever I venture outside — everyone cautions against it — I feel like every Syrian is staring at me. There’s shooting, I’m told, in an area just a few hundred yards away from the hotel where I’m staying. Demonstrations still take place in areas of the city, often after a funeral or after Friday prayers.

In a cafe, I see two waiters racing to a window and leaning out of it excitedly; one of them thought he could hear chanting going on in a different part of the city. I follow them to the window but strain to hear anything. In the early afternoon, even the centre of the city begins to shut down. By early evening, an informal curfew is in place and an unnatural quiet descends on the entire city.

Mohammed has been luckier than most. For the last few weeks he has been shuttling back and forth between Homs and Damascus for a part-time work placement, and now he is returning home. The roles between the two cities have been reversed; now it’s the hectic pace of Damascus that is a breath of fresh air from the eerie watchfulness of Homs.

All the same, Mohammed misses his family; he has nine brothers and sisters, all of them living in and around Homs. Occasionally his mobile phone goes off, and he speaks to one of them to hear their news and tell them he’s safe and on his way back home. Like most people in Homs, and like a great majority of the Syrian population, his family is Sunni. Many of the current protesters are Sunnis who believe they’ve been discriminated against under the Alawite regime — that President Assad has doled out jobs and influence to Alawites like himself.

In return, the government is claiming that the protests are being masterminded by Sunni extremists, stoked by Syria’s ill-wishers in Saudi Arabia and even inspired by Al-Qaeda. Mohammed doesn’t want to discuss religious divisions within his own country. He’s keener to know about the West.

“Is it true that you hate us Muslims? We just want to live in peace.” For the most part, however, the tone is playful, curious. “Are you married?” he wants to know, asking a question that no Arab male fails to ask of a Westerner, man or woman. No, I say. “Why not?” he wants to know. I ask him the same question, and he says with a giggle that he doesn’t even have a girlfriend. That’s something for the future, he says — something else, besides a better country, for a young Syrian to hope for.

Rewind to the bus ride, Damascus to Homs. Our conversation is becoming animated, and an old man in a headdress sitting beside us opens an eye from his half-sleep, wondering what we could be talking about in my English and his, which is half-garbled but still intelligible. These are Mohammed’s townspeople, and he seems relaxed around them.

There’s the occasional huge gun mounted on a lorry, a tank beached beside of the road. Mohammed keeps nudging me to look at it all. Neither of us speaks, but he fixes me a stare as if to say, “I was right, wasn’t I? You should have left the bus.”

My companion has become my lookout, counting down at regular intervals how many kilometres it is until our arrival at the bus station just outside Homs. It is just after midday. The only safe place, he tells me as we near Homs, is now the city centre itself. Together we devise a plan. He’s going to write down the name of a hotel there and then I’m going to show it to the taxi driver, go there directly, and not go out again until I leave.

On arrival, we spend 15 minutes walking around searching for the entrance to the hotel, looking, all the while, utterly conspicuous. We find what used to be the entrance, but it is shut, as if permanently. Together we find a side entrance down an alley, and what looks like a private, disused elevator that will take us up to the hotel.

On the way up to the sixth floor we exchange telephone numbers, and he tells me to call him if I need anything while I’m in Homs. I thank him profusely and implore him to stay in touch, that he must let me know if there’s anything I can do to help when I’m back in London.

The following day, as my fears of arrest grow, I’ll delete his name and number from my phone, just in case the police want to know how I got in and who I’ve been talking to. In any case, he doesn’t seem very interested in polite offers of assistance from random foreigners. It’s only later that I realise just what a help he’s been.

The anonymous business hotel he’s brought me to makes perfect cover for a visiting journalist. Never get a taxi on your own, someone advises me; if the driver is friendly with the authorities there’s a good chance he’ll take you straight to the police station and you’ll be deported, possibly after being roughed up. Two days after I leave, a Syrian news cameraman was found dead on the main street, according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists. He was found with his eyes gouged out.

In the hotel lobby, I offer Mohammed some money but he is not having any of it. He’s changed his mind about going home; one of the telephone calls he took was from home, he says, and they’ve told him it’s too dangerous to go back there. He’s going to stay with his sister, who lives in a safer part of town.

One final embrace and Mohammed is gone, back into his world of grim menace, leaving me in the hands of a hotel manager who turns out to be just as gently solicitous as Mohammed was.

* James Harkin is a journalist based in London. (c) 2011 Newsweek/Daily Beast Company LLC. All rights reserved.
Read more:  http://www.examiner.ie/features/sinister-silence-of-a-city-besieged-175459.html#ixzz1fgjZFu00

“Power is worth nothing, while you stand as an enemy to the people.”

“You can cut down the flower, but nothing can stop the coming of the spring.”

“It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.”
Robert Francis Kennedy quotes ( U.S. attorney general and adviser, 1925-1968)

‘Every day I think, this will be the day I get taken in again…’:

December 4, 2011

‘Every day I think, this will be the day I get taken in again…’: Ai Weiwei

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2011/nov/26/ai-weiwei-china-situation-quite-bad

 

The more he is harassed by his government, the more Ai Weiwei becomes a symbol of activism in China. But how much longer can he continue to speak out?

‘My voice is not for me. Every time I speak I think how many people had a voice that no one could hear’ … Ai Weiwei. Photograph: Dan Chung

The surveillance camera police have trained on the turquoise gate of Ai Weiwei’s studio in north Beijing captures a steady stream of visitors; journalists, well-wishers, the art crowd. Five months after his release from an 81-day detention, and in the wake of a fortnight of extraordinary expressions of public support, Ai is anticipating other arrivals. “Every day I think, ‘this will be the day I will be taken in again.’

“That’s also the impression they [the authorities] try to create, not just to me but to the whole society; to anybody who has different opinions,” he adds.

A few years ago the celebrated Chinese artist was a well-established figure in the international and domestic art worlds; provocative, certainly, but respectable enough to co-design the Olympic Bird’s Nest stadium in Beijing and be covered by Chinese state media. Then his outspoken views and activism triggered clashes with authority, culminating in this year’s detention – part of a broader crackdown on activists, lawyers and dissidents that saw dozens held and more harassed, threatened or placed under other restrictions. He has become, to many, the face of human rights in China: more a symbol than a person.

“The fact the government disappeared him, and then afterwards continued to go after him through various charges, sends a signal to other activists that even if you are well known it does not really protect you,” says Wang Songlian of the Chinese Human Rights Defenders Network. “On the other hand, the way he turned it around was very clever, and I think activists have been energised.”

“It’s never about me,” says Ai, now 54. “[My supporters] use me as a mark for themselves to recognise their own form of life: I become their medium. I am always very clear about that.”

Ai emerged from his ordeal in June, far slimmer – having lost almost 10kg, some of which he has regained – and apparently chastened.

“My energy was very low after these 81 days and I really needed the time to recover, mentally and physically. I was quite fragile,” he acknowledges. “I tried to do much less, because I also think this is not a game I can play. If they can make you disappear, why do you still play this game? Ridiculous.

“But even if you don’t speak, they still put these false accusations on you … So then you feel, if you don’t speak, you are part of this crime. I guess both sides are very disappointed.” He laughs.

There are fewer flashes of the puckish humour these days and he is more cautious in his pronouncements, but he is nonetheless saying more than the government would like, and recent actions by his supporters speak still louder. When authorities handed him a £1.5m tax bill, thousands helped him pay the first tranche, some flinging money over the studio walls. When police mooted the possibility that he was guilty of pornography – in relation to photos picturing him and four women, all naked – they tweeted nude pictures of themselves.

“We are trying to work with a very limited space. To people who do not understand the conditions, it may look ridiculous. But to us, that’s the only space,” he says.

“Normally people feel powerless. That’s how society becomes a society, if they think they have a little power and support and help to solve the problem.”

The downside is not only the risk of authorities using the donations against him – by deeming it illegal fundraising – but the ever-increasing expectations of his supporters. He was “thrilled” to learn how much support he had received during his detention, but the pressure from both sides has become hard to bear.

“One side has so much hope they put on my shoulders. I cannot really help them. I can’t even help me; my condition [situation] is quite bad,” he observes.

As he talks, a black spaniel is snuffling around the table; it’s not hard to see why Ai has such a fondness for his numerous pets. “I think they are in a parallel world … They don’t really care. I was in, I was out; they are always here.”

The passion and fury Ai inspires make it easy to overstate his influence. He is well known to art lovers in China, but a very long way from being a household name. He has galvanised people who would not normally make political statements; but they are a tiny proportion of even the educated elite, never mind the rest of the country’s 1.3bn population.

His bleak view of China has also been questioned. It is true that people are far freer to criticise authority than 30 or even 10 years ago; that their personal freedoms are vastly expanded and that many are broadly satisfied with the tacit deal – growing economic prosperity in exchange for political limits.

But others share his concern about the Communist party’s rigid grip on power as it strives to reassert control over mainstream and social media, and to roll back some of the space that an embryonic civil society has carved out. Last week prominent Chinese legal scholar Jiang Ping warned that the country increasingly resembled a dictatorship.

The Chinese government insists Ai’s case is unrelated to human rights and that he was held for tax evasion; critics say the western media have lionised him when they should be assessing his financial records. But it is impossible to do so; police confiscated the documents of the company that handled his affairs. Ai deems the tax bill “political revenge or punishment” and says it has no factual basis.

“It is legitimate to ask whether Ai Weiwei or, more accurately, Beijing Fake Cultural Development Ltd, owes taxes,” Joshua Rosenzweig, a Hong Kong-based independent human rights researcher, wrote recently.

“It is also legitimate to raise questions about political motivations behind the prosecution, because of the particular way in which the police intervened in this case prior to any investigation by tax authorities, the fact that Ai’s disappearance was carried out in the context of dozens of other detentions … unambiguously political in nature, and the way the propaganda machinery has been mobilised to smear his reputation.”

Ai was reportedly interrogated more than 50 times during his detention, but about his views and activism rather than his financial dealings. He does not go into detail about what happened but points out that many of the others detained this spring were treated far worse. According to the accounts that have trickled out some were beaten; many were deprived of sleep, forced to sit in stress positions and threatened. Several still show clear symptoms of trauma, say friends.

“I think I recovered the most. About 100 people were taken in. Only a few have spoken out. Most of them [seem] to be silenced for ever – some you can see are completely crushed,” Ai says.

“It’s hard to recover. You become not so innocent. You become, in a way, more sophisticated, which I think you shouldn’t. We should all have more simple happiness … You become bitter.”

And yet, he adds: “Maybe there is something I got from it. Maybe you also start to be clear on certain things.”

The parallels with his father’s case are inescapable. Ai Qing was a revered poet, which in part explains the relative protection his son has enjoyed, but endured years of persecution after being condemned as a rightist. “His whole heart loved art and literature. But he was crushed; he almost committed suicide several times,” says Ai, who grew up in a labour camp.

“My voice is not for me. Every time I make a sentence I think how many people for how many generations had a voice that no one could hear. At most they will be remembered as numbers; in many cases, even numbers don’t exist.

“I think I have this responsibility for my father’s generation, and especially future generations.”

Still, he insists, “I am not a dissident” – simply someone put on the spot by the government’s actions.

Amid the political storm, it is easy to lose sight of Ai’s artistic record. His work is on show in London, Berlin and Taipei; next year will see exhibitions in Sweden, France and the Netherlands. More remarkably, a gallery in Beijing is exhibiting some of his past work – including the list of names of children who died in the Sichuan earthquake. His attempts to tally the deaths of those who had died in shoddily constructed schools put him on a collision course with authorities.

Friends say he views the outside world critically, too; his 2007 work, Fairytale, in which he transported 1,001 compatriots to Germany, was not only about exposing participants to another way of life, but about challenging European perceptions of the Chinese.

His studio is busy again, but “I don’t really care that much about if I want to be more successful or less successful in art, because I never think life and art should be separate,” Ai says. “What’s life if you don’t have conversation and joy and anger?”

Activism is the inevitable result of his art, rather than a distraction from it: “If I was a scientist maybe [restrictions on expression] wouldn’t bother me – but as an artist, finding a way to communicate with people is the core activity.”

In an authoritarian society, he adds, that can only lead to conflict. Many wonder if Ai will tire of the unending tussle and move abroad. His conditions of release prevent him from leaving Beijing for a year, but the government would probably be happy to see him go; critics usually slip from public view once they emigrate.

He says he has to respect the opinions of his family, but thinks it important “to try to stay here as long as possible”.

In any case, China has, he says, “braver, more brilliant” young people than him, with a fresh set of ideas.

“That’s also quite encouraging. It’s about life, actually. It’s a story about life,” he says. Not about him.

Five other figures of dissent in China

Chen Guangcheng

The blind lawyer was jailed for damaging property and obstructing traffic after helping women who had suffered forced abortions. He has been under house arrest since his release last year; scores of activists have shown their support by attempting to visit his village in Shandong, despite being beaten and harassed by thugs there.

Liu Xiaobo

Beijing was furious when the Nobel committee awarded the jailed author the peace prize last year. He is serving an 11-year sentence for subversion of state power, having co-authored Charter 08, a call for democratic reform in China. Officials say he is a criminal, not a dissident.

Liu Xia

The poet had little interest in politics, but spoke out about her husband Liu Xiaobo’s case and vanished after he won the Nobel prize. She is thought to be under house arrest; in February she made brief online contact with a friend, saying she was a hostage and no one could help her.

Gao Zhisheng

Once feted by authorities, the lawyer angered them by taking on sensitive cases such as those relating to the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement. He vanished in 2009 and alleged – during a brief and bizarre reappearance last year – that police had subjected him to sustained torture.

Ni Yulan

Clashes with officials over housing rights left the lawyer disabled and homeless. She was among the many detained this spring; while most have been released, Ni and her husband are awaiting trial for “creating a disturbance”. Human rights groups say they are increasingly concerned about her health.

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2011/nov/26/ai-weiwei-china-situation-quite-bad

“Power is worth nothing, while you stand as an enemy to the people.”
“It was always seems impossible….
until it gets done.”
- Nelson Mandela

A voice for China’s bottom rung

November 21, 2011

A voice for China’s bottom rung

By Chris Barton

5:30 AM Saturday Nov 12, 2011

  1. From      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10765417
  2. Share6
  3. Email
  4. Print

                       

Expand

 

Liao Yiwu. Photo / Supplied

Persecuted author Liao Yiwu tells stories of an underclass the outside world rarely gets to see. He talks to Chris Barton

The Chinese Government hopes that every Chinese will be like a pig or animal – just eating and making money without thinking.

When Liao Yiwu escaped the “colossal and invisible prison called China” in July, calmly walking across the border into Vietnam, he couldn’t believe his luck. “They stamped my passport,” he says on the phone from Chicago, via an interpreter.

In light of Liao’s predicament – hounded everywhere by the Chinese police, repeatedly denied an exit visa, barred from travelling to literary festivals abroad, his books banned in China and forced to sign a guarantee to cease publishing outside China – the exit stamp was nothing short of a miracle. Which perhaps explains why he’s so taken with saying “good luck to you” – one of the few phrases of English he has, and which he’s delighted to use at every opportunity.

The valid stamp is one of the reasons the persecuted Chinese writer doesn’t see himself as an exile. “I consider myself as a writer who has to leave China to pursue my freedom to publish and to write.” The choice of “Freedom or Exile?” is also the title of Liao’s Writers and Readers Festival talk in Auckland next Saturday.

Article continues below

“When I left, I left my house and all my property and my family there and that’s the sacrifice I had to do. I also left without permission from the police who were in charge of me,” he says. “In the 1990s I was locked up in prison and when I was released I was thrown into another invisible prison. The whole country is like a big prison to me. They monitored my activities and sometimes they moved me from city to city and my life was constantly disrupted by the police presence.”

Liao’s crime, which landed him in jail for four years, was writing and reciting his epic poem Massacre, composed in 1989 in condemnation of the Chinese Government’s bloody crackdown on the student protest in Tiananmen Square.

Strangely, it was when he was in prison, where he was tortured – on one occasion handcuffed, with his hands behind his back, for 23 days – and where he twice attempted suicide that Liao first learned about New Zealand. “One day somebody brought me a newspaper article saying that there was a well known poet who left China and settled in New Zealand and he had committed suicide and we asked why – it seemed such a beautiful country.”

It was a story widely covered in China at the time as an example of the perils of exile. The poet was Gu Cheng, a prominent member of China’s “Misty Poets”. Their work, reacting against the restrictions of the Cultural Revolution, was denounced as “obscure”, “misty”, or “hazy”.

In 1993, on Waiheke Island, Gu Cheng attacked and killed his wife Xie Ye with an axe and then hanged himself.

Liao is all too familiar with tragedy, but is looking forward to visiting New Zealand, which Gu Cheng described as a pristine Eden. First he’ll be returning to Germany, where he’s living at present, to receive this years’ Geschwister Scholl literary prize for the German edition of his prison memoir, due to be published in English next year.

Liao says it was the Chinese Government that declared him a political exile. Shortly after his escape, an editorial in the Beijing-based newspaper the Global Times proclaimed: “Liao is quite alien to the current political environment in China. He lives an unhappy life as the changes of Chinese society don’t appeal to him, and his hatred for the Chinese political system can’t be resolved.”

Liao partly agrees: “I dislike the political system, especially the party and the Government, because I’ve been a victim of the totalitarian regime for years. I love the people I interviewed. I love my family and my friends. I hope to go back home, but not the country that’s under the current Government.”

The people Liao interviewed are behind what the Government dislikes about him. The stories he gathered expose first-hand accounts of a China rarely seen. Not just the brutal prison system and what Liao encountered living with death row inmates, but also stories told by the underprivileged of Chinese society.

When he was released from prison, Liao found his wife had left him and he was homeless. Working as a street musician, he began chronicling the lives of the people he encountered. The result was The Corpse Walker and Other True Stories of Life in China, published in 2008.

The book introduced the word diceng or “bottom rung of society”. Its stories include that of a professional mourner, a human trafficker, a murderer, a beggar, a feng shui master, a fortune teller, a homosexual and a Falun Gong practitioner. “I spent a lot of time with people who don’t have a voice and I felt it was my responsibility to reveal the truth so future generations know what was really happening in China,” he says.

While many of the stories in Corpse Walker tell of brutality and repression under the Cultural Revolution, they are all rooted in China’s present, grappling with both the unintended consequences of Chairman Mao’s reforms and the country’s new embrace of the market economy. The human trafficker Qian, for example, blithely justifies how he deceitfully entices women with the promise of a better life only to sell them into enforced marriage or prostitution.

“I was also trying to provide a solution to a problem that the Chinese Government faced. In some northern regions, there are too many bachelors,” Qian tells Liao. “By taking women over there, I balanced the yin and yang. This helps dissolve the young guys’ sexual tension.”

The stories also tell of a country still wedded to old ways, superstitions and beliefs. “In the 60s and 70s people hurt one another as a result of Mao’s political campaigns,” says the Feng Shui master. “In the 90s people hurt one another in order to make more money.”

Liao is alarmed by the country’s new focus – “to be rich is to be glorious” – the jacking up of real estate values, the destruction of natural resources and mining exploitation. “People have lost all their traditional values. They are so single-minded in pursuing money that China has become a big dumpster with all the trashy value systems,” he says, perhaps a little embellished by his translator Wen Huang, who sometimes reverts to American slang to portray the nuances of China’s many dialects.

“Western countries always claim that if they do business with China they should be able to engage China and improve its human rights situation, but the reality is that the human rights situation in China has worsened in the past several years.” He points to people driven from their homes to make way for the Beijing Olympics.

On New Zealand’s pursuit of free trade with China, Liao defers to the New Zealand Government’s right to decide its own policies. But as a writer now freed from China’s censorship and repression, he’s not afraid to make suggestions. “I think that the New Zealand Government should not hold double standards. If you don’t pressure China to improve their democratic system what’s the point of having a democratic system of your own? You have to stick with certain principles.”

Liao acknowledges China’s economic reforms have benefited many who now are wealthy enough to send their children to study abroad, but notes also a polarisation between the rich and the poor as a result. He acknowledges, too, that in comparison to the persecutions and executions of the Mao era, Christianity in China has revived.

The issue is examined in Liao’s latest book God is Red: The Secret Story of How Christianity Survived and Flourished in Communist China. As the translator’s note points out there are 70 million practising Christians in China, 5 per cent of its total population. “In an overtly atheist society, Christianity is China’s largest formal religion.” But the rise of religion is carefully controlled, with churches required to belong to Government-prescribed organisations.

Liao’s book shows that though many Christians accept the “official” churches there is also a growing “house-church movement” where people gather for worship in homes. Inevitably, says Liao, it’s a movement that will run into conflict with the atheist Government. “To me the persecution will continue once the religion becomes a threat to the government rule. God and Satan can never share the same platform.”

For Liao, who is not himself Christian, the crux of the problem in China is freedom of expression. Because the Government feels so insecure politically, artists and intellectuals, or anyone who speaks out become the victims of persecution.

Following the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia the Chinese Government became paranoid a similar movement might flower in China. “They acted like the mafia,” says Liao. “They abducted scholars and outspoken lawyers and had them disappear. I was targeted. The police monitored my activities and came to threaten me.”

What is the Government so afraid of? “Like any totalitarian government, the Chinese Government hopes that every Chinese will be like a pig or animal – just eating and making money without thinking and without any of their own ideas. This way they will be easier to rule,” says Liao. “But we’re not animals. We think independently and have the desire to express ourselves. That’s why the Chinese Government is always wary and paranoid when people start to speak out against their practices.”

Book ticket giveaway

We have five copies of The Corpse Walker plus five tickets to Liao Yiwu’s Writers & Readers Festival event to give away to Herald readers. To be in the draw for both, email your name, address and phone number to weekend@nzherald.co.nz. Entries close 5pm Tuesday November 15.

The Auckland Writers & Readers Festival presents Liao Yiwu: Freedom or Exile? Saturday November 19, 4pm at the University of Auckland Business School. For more information go to writersfestival.co.nz

By Chris Barton | Email Chris

 

From http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10765417

“I work for human rights for ALL!”

 

Shared by Craig Lock (“Information and Inspiration Distributer, Incorrigible Encourager and People-builder”)

“I am being driven forward Into an unknown land. ….. who struggled with making his every day life fit with his spiritual beliefs.”

“Success – for the glory of God – or for your own, for the peace of mankind or for your own? Upon the answer to this question depends on the result of your actions.”

“Become grateful as your deeds become less and less associated with your name, as your feet ever more lightly tread the earth.”

“Life only demands from you the strength you possess. Only one feat is possible – not to have run away.”

“Only he who keeps his eye fixed on the far horizon will find his right road.”

- Dag Hammarskjold (from ‘Markings’)

“Use every letter you write, every conversation you have, every meeting you attend, to express your fundamental beliefs and dreams. Affirm to others the vision of the world you want. You are a free, immensely powerful source of life and goodness. Affirm it. Spread it. Radiate it. Think day and night about it and you will see a miracle happen: the greatness of your own life. “

– Dr. Robert Muller, Former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations

“Each one of us can enrich the spiritual experience of others. Because humanity has a common soul, each one of us can reach into ourselves and provide similar inspirational energy for those around us. And doing this will produce positive change… in some small way to help make a better world.

Life does have meaning. We just need to trust the journey… through finding our own inspiration that resides within each person, each soul. Then this individual spirit will ripple, radiating out to others… and so enhance the common good of all human beings on earth. “

- craig as inspired by the words of Pat Lynch (Chief executive of the New Zealand Catholic Education Office)

About the Submitter: Craig believes in (and loves) sharing information and insights to try to make some difference in this world: to help and especially encourage people along life’s magical journey to live their dreams and be all they can be… and that brings him the greatest joy. He truly believes in the great potential of people to be all they can be an become.

The various books that Craig “felt inspired to write” (including ‘The Prize and ‘The Grand Prize’ are available at http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005GGMAW4http://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/craiglockhttp://www.creativekiwis.com/books.htmlwww.lulu.com/craiglock and www.craigsbooks.wordpress.com

“The world’s smallest and most exclusive bookstore”

He is currently “working” on ‘Endless Possibilities, Far and Unlimited Horizons’ – true inspiring stories of the human condition in overcoming seemingly impossible odds and ‘The Prize’.

The submitter’s blogs (with extracts from his various writings: articles, books and new manuscripts) are at http://craigsblogs.wordpress.com

“Together, one mind, one soul at a time, let’s see how many people we can impact, empower, encourage and perhaps even inspire to reach their fullest potentials. Change YOUR world and you help change THE world…for the better”

“Only he who keeps his eye fixed on the far horizon will find his right road.”

- Dag Hammarskjold (from ‘Markings’)

THE FEARLESS, THE BRAVE RUSSIAN JOURNALIST: THE SCOURGE OF PUTIN’S RUSSIA

August 26, 2011

THE FEARLESS, THE BRAVE RUSSIAN JOURNALIST:

THE SCOURGE OF PUTIN’S RUSSIA

EXTRACTED FROM:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/7105486/Sister-of-murdered-Russian-journalist-She-didnt-stop-she-couldnt-stop.html

Tags: Anna Politkovskaya , Russia, Roya Nikkhah, Telegraph, Journalist, Fearless  Reporter, Putin

Sister of murdered Russian journalist: ‘She didn’t stop, she couldn’t stop’

The sister of Anna Politkovskaya, Elena Kudimova, tells why the Russian writer’s crusading journalism cost her her life.

By Roya Nikkhah

Published: 8:00AM GMT 31 Jan 2010

Anna Politkovskaya was one of the most respected and feared journalists in the world

Even as a schoolgirl, Anna Politkovskaya questioned authority and exposed oppression of the vulnerable.

“Since she was very young, she was quite a determined person, she always
wanted to protect people,” recalls her sister, Elena Kudimova. “At
school, she was a kind of leader in her class. When she thought that the
teacher wasn’t being fair to somebody, she would stand up and say so.”

 *

It was a determination that drove Politkovskaya to become one of the most respected and feared journalists in the world, as she shone a light on the horrors of the Chechen wars,
voiced her opposition to President Vladimir Putin’s authoritarian
regime, and exposed the dark side of politics, big business and state
corruption in the dawning era of 21st-century Russia.

But that same doggedness in pursuit of the truth almost certainly led to
her murder in October 2006, when, aged 48, she was shot dead in the
lift of her apartment block in Moscow.

“Of course we were worried about her for many years. Her life was in
constant danger and I always knew it was a risk, but nothing prepares
you for your sister’s death,” says Mrs Kudimova, as she gazes up to the
photograph of her younger sister on a cabinet in her west London
apartment.

“Anna always wanted to be a journalist,” she continues. “Don’t forget,
we lived in the Soviet Union behind the Iron Curtain so people didn’t go
abroad, they mostly stayed where they were born, but she thought being a
journalist you could go around different places to meet people. Anna
wanted to look around.” Some of her best stories have now been collected
into a new book, Nothing But the Truth: Selected Dispatches, which
includes her award-winning accounts of the Chechen conflicts, the Moscow
theatre siege siege of 2002, during which she was invited by the
terrorists to act as a negotiator, and her encounters and interviews
with world leaders including Tony Blair and George W. Bush.

After graduating from Moscow State University’s school of journalism in
1980, Politkovskaya, by then a mother of two, started her career at the
Aeroflot airline newspaper, before joining the Soviet paper Izvestiya in
1982. From 1994 to 1999, she worked on the progressive national
newspaper Obshchaya Gazeta as crime correspondent, then editor-in-chief,
before joining Novaya Gazeta, one of Russia’a only independent
newspapers, where she worked until her death.

Politkovskaya became a household name in Russia with her reports from
Chechnya during the late 1990s, where despite numerous death threats,
she defied state intimidation with her despatches which probed the true
nature of the occupation of Chechnya, and documented countless examples
of atrocities perpetrated against the Chechen people.

“She was just completely shocked when she first went there, because you
didn’t expect to see such hardships of war in our country,” says Mrs
Kudimova. “Most of the newspapers in Russia didn’t want to tell what was
happening there to the full extent, because they were mainly
state-owned and the state didn’t want it out — that’s why Anna was
determined to keep covering it.

“It did affect her deeply. I think it had an effect on her character in
the end. I think she became more gloomy because she was investigating
too many difficult cases, most of them were about deaths or
disappearances of people, not very pleasant stuff.

“She was so persistent;  because she felt she only had power as a journalist, and the authorities had to deal with it if she wrote it.
So there were people who didn’t like her writing about it. The Russian
special police forces threatened to kill her and sent letters to her and
her editor, because she was writing about what they were doing in
Chechnya, which was extremely cruel.”

In 2001, after interviewing a Chechen grandmother who had endured 12
days of beatings, electric shocks and confinement in a pit by federal
forces, Politkovskaya was detained by Russian troops in the southern
mountain village of Khottuni, and tortured before being subjected to a
mock execution. “She was afraid, of course,” says Mrs Kudimova. “But it
did not stop her.”

Politkovskaya was world-renowned for her war reporting by the time
President Putin took office, a fact the Russian government was none too
keen on. Her books, including A Dirty War: A Russian reporter in
Chechnya, published in 2001, and Putin’s Russia which followed three
years later, were bitterly critical of the Russian government, earning
her pariah status as Putin’s regime tried to muffle her voice.

“She was very famous by then, but when Putin came to power, they decided
not to cover what went on in Chechnya, to try and keep it quiet from
the rest of the country,” says Mrs Kudimova. “That’s why Anna probably
wasn’t in a good relationship with the government, because she was doing
quite the opposite — she was trying to attract the attention of people
in Russia but also of people abroad, about what was happening.

“So the state tried to protect society from her and what she was saying.

“People stopped inviting her to events, when before she had always been
on television talking about issues. It was much better for democracy
under Yeltsin’s time than under Putin, for sure.”

In her foreword to Nothing But the Truth, Baroness Helena Kennedy QC
recalls speaking to Politkovskaya about her homeland after presenting
her with an award in 2005. “Anna painted a haunting portrait of Putin’s
Russia, a country governed by an administration which bore many of the
hallmarks of Stalin’s,” she says. “Here was a land whose own secret
service suppressed civil liberties, and where fear stalked universities,
newsrooms and every corridor in which democracy might have flourished.”

During the Moscow theatre siege, when a group of armed Chechens
demanding the withdrawal of Russian troops from their territory, took
850 people hostage, Politkovskaya was called up to act as negotiator.

“She had just arrived in LA to receive an award, and then had to rush
back because the Chechens had asked her to help,” says Mrs Kudimova.
“She was scared, she didn’t know who these terrorists were, but they
trusted her because of her writing. She promised she would talk to the
authorities, but I don’t think anybody wanted to listen to her.” The
two-day siege ended in the death of more than 120 hostages when the
Russian special forces pumped a poisonous chemical into the theatre’s
ventilation system before raiding the building.

In 2004, as Anna made her way to Beslan, where armed terrorists were
holding more than 1,000 school children and adults captive, she had one
of her most serious “wake-up calls”. After boarding the plane bound for
Rostov-on-Don, she asked for a cup of black tea. Moments after drinking
it, she collapsed unconscious and woke up in hospital, poisoned,
according to doctors, by an “unknown substance”.

When her editor at Novaya Gazeta asked the hospital for the medical
results, he was told that everything related to her case had been
destroyed.

“Anna told me that there were two men on the plane who boarded without
tickets, and she suspected they were FSB [Federal Security Service, a
successor to the KGB],” says her sister. “It was a wake-up call, but
there were many wake up-calls.

“After this, when she got better, we just tried to convince her to
accept one of the many grants she was offered, to go abroad for a while
write a book, to write about something else, but she didn’t stop, she
couldn’t stop.

She had such strong principles, so what her family wanted, she couldn’t give them.”

I ask Mrs Kudimova if she thinks her sister could have been happy
writing about less weighty issues, perhaps gardening or fashion?

She smiles, rolling her eyes. “No, I don’t think so, but it would have
brought her character back, which was quite changed by writing about war
and corruption. She was quite a bubbly person before. But it was like a
heavy weight on her, thinking about other peoples lives all the time,
helping people to investigate their cases of missing relatives. She
became gloomy. She didn’t want to write about easier things, but
everyone insisted because she became too involved, it wasn’t good for
her.”

Politkovskaya finally agreed to think about other subject matters when
her daughter, Vera, announced she was pregnant. “She thought that if she
continued writing about conflict and wars it won’t be good for the
grandchild, so she promised that as soon as the baby is born, she would
change and would just write about something more pleasant,” says Mrs
Kudimova.

Politkovskaya never had the chance. She was murdered when Vera was four months pregnant.

Her killer remains at large. Three men who were charged with directly
aiding her murderer — two Chechen brothers and a former policemen — were
acquitted last year. A lieutenant colonel in the FSB, who was also
suspected of a leading role in her murder, was cleared in another trial.
Many people in Russia believe that her murder was ordered at the very
highest levels of government.

“I have no idea who killed her,” says Mrs Kudimova. “There were people
put in jail after investigations because of her articles, and there were
so many people who didn’t like her writing about the conflicts and
corruption that when the investigation started, they had at least six
people who could have killed her.”

The Supreme Court of Russia recently ordered a new investigation in
Politkovskaya’s murder, but does her sister believe that there is the
will in her homeland to bring the killer to justice? “I don’t feel it,”
she says, shaking her head. “But sooner or later, everything becomes
known.”

During her lifetime, Politkovskaya won dozens of awards, and her work is
posthumously celebrated with many prizes around the world given in her
name, but Mrs Kudimova hopes her sister’s legacy will one day be
immortalised on the silver screen.

“I still hope that they make a feature film about her,” she says. “Soon
after she was killed, there was an idea to do it and there are people
talking about it. Her life was so colourful and eventful, a film would
be a great tribute. I don’t want her name to be forgotten.”

What, I ask, would a leading lady playing Politkovskaya need to
understand first and foremost about her sister and what drove her? She
opens the book and points to a page which features an internal
questionnaire circulated to Novaya Gazeta staff, where one of the
questions asks: “Why, and for whom, are you doing your work?” To which
Politkovskaya simply answered:

“For people, and for the sake of people.”

 Nothing But the Truth: Selected Dispatches by Anna Politkovskaya
(Harvill Secker) is available from Telegraph Books at £16.99 + £1.25
p&p. To order, call 0844 871 1516 or visit books.telegraph.co.uk

EXTRACTED FROM:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/7105486/Sister-of-murdered-Russian-journalist-She-didnt-stop-she-couldnt-stop.html

   “You can kill the flower, but we can’t stop the coming of the spring.”

****************

Nothing But The Truth – Anna Politkovskaya

 Source: The List (Issue 649)

 Date: 1 February 2010

Written by: Brian Donaldson

In 2006, Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya was murdered near her
home. Brian Donaldson reads a collection of her articles and wonders
whether justice will ever be served.

In a world where the worst atrocities some journalists might face are
their copy being ravaged by unscrupulous subeditors and unreasonable
deadlines being imposed by cold-hearted commissioning editors, the fate
of our kin abroad make such concerns seem horribly petty. At the start
of the year, Siberian reporter Konstantin Popov was found dead in a
police cell having suffered severe internal injuries. Friends allege
that he was subjected to a prolonged and sadistic beating by officers,
including being raped with a broom handle. In December, 27 journalists
were massacred during an ambush in the Philippines. Tales of kidnapping
and death threats are almost routine in Guatemala, Pakistan and Sri
Lanka.

The case of Anna Politkovskaya haunts the profession. The arch critic of
the Russian war in Chechnya and an outspoken voice of anti-Putin
dissent, she was gunned down in the lift of her Moscow apartment block
on 7 October 2006 – a pistol with a silencer was later found at the
scene of the crime. Vladimir Putin was celebrating his birthday that
day, but emerged three days later to describe Politkovskaya as
‘insignificant’ and ‘well-known only in the west’. One year on, Russia’s
prosecutor general Yury Chaika gravely announced that the blame rested
with a Moscow criminal gang but that ‘operational support’ for the
assassination had been given by the police and officers of the FSB (the
spy division formerly known as the KGB). A month later, Chaika was
removed from the case and a catalogue of acts, varying from bungled to
obscene, are then committed in the course of the investigation as key
suspects are released or allowed to flee the country; the judge
announces the trial of four defendants will take place in a closed
session, falsely claiming this to be the wishes of the jury; the lawyer
for the Politkovskaya family suggests that the defendants (who are later
acquitted) are victims of an elaborate set-up. Crucial evidence such as
photographs of suspects and video footage of the likely assassin
entering her apartment block have somewhat conveniently gone missing.
Whether Politkovskaya’s real killer will ever be tracked down is open to
conjecture.

Someone somewhere clearly felt that Politkovskaya, whose reports
appeared in the opposition newspaper Novaya Gazeta, was not quite so
minor a figure as Putin had claimed. Just what threat did she pose to
those dark forces at play in an increasingly corrupt Russia and in
Chechnya, where a Kremlin-backed warlord Ramzan Kadyrov rules with
violent impunity? Portraits of that leader line the streets, Saddam
Hussein-style, while he barely hides his murderous intentions, having
once told Natalia Estemirova, another now dead human rights journalist,
‘yes, my hands are up to the elbows in blood … I will kill and kill bad
people.’

In Nothing But The Truth, a visceral and now poignant collection of her
writings for Novaya Gazeta, Politkovskaya does what she aimed to do
best: simply relay her observations and let the reader decide. She is
unfailingly caustic about her fellow journalists in Russia who she views
as lackeys of the Kremlin, deliberately ignoring the pain and anguish
inflicted by Putin, and Boris Yeltsin before him. Campaigning journalism
has lost many of its most strident practitioners down the years, but
the loss of Anna Politkovskaya leaves a stain on Russia and its friends
across Europe.

Nothing But The Truth is out now published by Harvill Secker.

More: Books, Non-fiction (Books), Anna Politkovskaya, Chechnya, Journalism, Konstantin Popov, Russia

Related Articles

 Russian court overturns acquittal of men charged over Anna Politkovskaya murder

 Trial to begin over ‘contract killing’ of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya

 Former Finland president Martti Ahtisaari wins Nobel Peace Prize

 Russian human rights activists accuse Nobel Committee of pandering to Kremlin

 Natalya Estemirova’s heirs: The women who risk all to expose Chechnya’s horrors

“You can kill the flower, but we can’t stop the coming of the spring.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

 

“Those who stand up for justice will always be on the right side of history.”

- Dr Martin Luther-King, jnr

SNIPER BULLET ENDS LIFE-LONG FRIENDSHIP

August 25, 2011

SNIPER
BULLET ENDS LIFE-LONG FRIENDSHIP

From http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/10053835/snipers-bullet-ends-life-long-friendship-in-libya/

 

ZAWIYAH,
Libya (Reuters) – Life-long friends Abdul Ghani and Majdi often played soccer
and billiards together as youngsters, went to the same law school and then
joined the rebel movement fighting to topple Muammar Gaddafi.

A
sniper’s bullet shattered their dream of opening up a law practice together in
a new democratic Libya where they intended to focus on human rights cases.

Minutes
after doctors began putting a cloth over Abdul Ghani’s corpse in a hospital on
the edge of the strategic town of Zawiyah, Majdi was slowly led into the room.

He
recognized his lifeless best friend, who had a bullet lodged in his head, then
broke down and wept in the arms of an older rebel.

“We
spent nearly every day together since we were eight. He was like a
brother,” Majdi told Reuters later, sitting on the fender of a car outside
the hospital.

“We
wanted to do so much. We wanted to enjoy freedom in a new Libya and work as
proper lawyers who could actually help people.”

Abdul
Ghani was killed during the biggest military breakthrough for Libya’s rebels in
months.

At the
weekend, fighters attacked Zawiyah, just 50 km (30 miles) west of Tripoli,
Muammar Gaddafi’s stronghold. They say they control 80 percent of it but are
still vulnerable to pro-Gaddafi snipers concealed in high buildings.

The last
time Majdi saw Abdul Ghani, they were walking toward an enemy-held part of
Zawiyah when a mortar round landed nearby.

“The
explosion startled us. I wanted to retreat but Abdul Ghani said ‘let’s go after
them’ and he kept going,” said Majdi.

SENSE OF
HUMOUR

Outside
the hospital, other rebels walked by, tapped Majdi on the shoulder and told him
to rejoice, not cry, because Abdul Ghani had become a martyr for a noble cause
blessed by Allah.

But the
tears kept flowing. “I liked his sense of humor the most. He was such a
funny person,” said Majdi. “He was also kind. And he read a lot about
law. I admired that.”

Joining
the revolt against Gaddafi was not an easy decision and the 24-year-old friends
were aware of the risks. Pro-Gaddafi

forces
were still firing rockets at Zawiyah — where Majdi will soon return to battle
– as he spoke.

But they
felt taking up arms was the only way forward, said Majdi.

“Gaddafi’s
oppression was too much. Libya is a country with no freedom. No freedom of
expression. Just no freedom. Look at that school. Do you think students were
taught about human rights there? No,” said Majdi, pointing to a building
beside the hospital.

“Working
as lawyers in the Libya run by Gaddafi would be useless. We would have no
power. So we became rebels.”

Gaddafi’s
government says the rebels are armed gangs inspired by al Qaeda. Majdi looks
like a typical liberal-minded young man, with his blue jeans and sleeveless
collar shirt.

Knocked
back by the loss of his friend, he seemed to have lost the brash zeal of some
other rebels. Instead, he was turning to his Islamic faith for strength.

“I
hope that God will let us take the rest of Zawiyah and get rid of
Gaddafi,” he said. “Please God.”

(Editing by Alistair Lyon)

From http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/10053835/snipers-bullet-ends-life-long-friendship-in-libya/

Reproduced at bravejournalists.wordpress.com

“Those
who stand up for justice will always be on the right side of history.”

- Dr Martin Luther King, jnr

Confront Iran on brutality, not nukes

August 25, 2011

Confront Iran on brutality, not nukes

By Katherine Butler

Tags: Iran, Shirin Ebadi , Katherine Butler, brutality, judges,
journalist, ‘The Journalist’

From http://www.nzherald.co.nz/iran/news/article.cfm?l_id=51&objectid=10651276

She was Iran’s first female judge, has served time in the country’s prisons
for challenging the Islamic regime and, to the chagrin of its hardline rulers,
became, in 2003, the only Iranian citizen to win a Nobel peace prize.

On the eve of the anniversary of Iran’s disputed presidential election and
the crushed “green revolution” that followed, Shirin Ebadi has
attacked Western governments for wrongly fixating on Iran’s nuclear ambitions,
while remaining silent about the repression of those who challenge the regime
peacefully in the quest for democratic freedoms.

The human rights lawyer warns that the Ahmadinejad Government is using more
violent repression against its people than at any time in the 30 years since
the Islamic revolution.

Twelve months after the remarkable events which, for a brief spell last
June, looked sufficiently dramatic to topple not just Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
Iran’s President, but to cause the Islamic revolution itself to unravel, the
“green movement” is a much depleted, if not spent, force.

Executions, detentions, televised show trials, torture and reports of prison
rapes have left many Iranians fearful and possibly drained of determination to
keep the “green” drumbeat going.

However, Ebadi strongly rejects the suggestion that the democracy movement
is defeated, insisting that it is the hardline regime which is being torn apart
both by its own unpopularity and the internal struggles that its crackdown has
provoked.

“The present violence is unheard of in the 30 years since the Islamic
revolution. In the past, they used to save the violence for those who were anti
the regime. Now, they are using it against those from within their own
ranks,” she said.

As evidence, she cites a recent attempt to prevent the grandson of Ayatollah
Khomeini, the founder of the 1979 revolution, from delivering an oration:
“This is definitely the sign of an internal struggle. What the outcome of
that struggle will be we cannot predict yet.”

In the immediate term, she said the Government’s vulnerability would mean an
increase in executions, extreme jail terms for activists and other forms of
violent repression.

Seeking perhaps to rally the spirits of those who last year endured a brutal
militia crackdown after taking to the streets, the Nobel laureate – who has
herself been forced into exile since last June – forecast the Iranian people
would yet defy their leaders: “There is fire beneath the ashes. Anything
can make this fire blow again.”

But she condemned what she called the “unfortunate” obsession in
the United States, Britain and other European countries with the nuclear
dispute – to the exclusion of any action to defend the human rights of ordinary
Iranians.

The UN Security Council this week adopted a fourth round of punitive
sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programme but Ebadi questioned the
relevance of the measures, which are geared at stopping Iran acquiring more
weapons.

“The Iranian Government has already dedicated enough of its budget to
weapons and doesn’t need to grow its stockpile any further,” she said.

She did not go as far as some of her supporters, who are privately dismayed
at the timing of the UN vote, believing it sends the wrong message from the
international community to the people of Iran. But she said the nuclear
question is “not at all important to the people of Iran”.

“What matters to them is to have a job and to have freedom … The
reason why they demonstrate, even if they know they will be killed or arrested,
is because of the lack of jobs and freedom.”

Ebadi accused Western governments of failing to take steps to demonstrate
their commitment to democratic values. But fear of losing business contracts in
Iran meant they remained silent or colluded in the brutal clampdown.

She claimed that a satellite communications company, part-owned by the
French state, had bowed to pressure from the Iranian regime to block
transmission of two TV channels, BBC Persian and Voice of America – both
valuable sources of uncensored information for Iranians. Nokia, the Finnish
multinational, had also sold Iran technology that allows the regime to spy on people
via their mobile phones.

She said European governments should stop issuing visas to prominent Iranian
politicians and crack down on or blacklist companies that do business with Iran
when their products or technology are used in the services of repression.

“The Iranian people have the right to ask themselves whether the French
Government believes in freedom of expression or not. And if they they do, why
don’t they stop these kinds of transactions? … All we ask of Western
countries is that they don’t support the Iranian Government in the
repression.”

Life in Iran a year after the green awakening has, on the surface, returned
to a tense normality. But that is an illusion, Ebadi said. “What is clear
is that the population remains extremely dissatisfied with the situation. They
would pay any price for change.”

She said some within the “green movement” would be satisfied with
reform within the framework of the Islamic Republic. “Others think the
problems lie within the very roots of the system… but what matters most is
that they all agree the present situation cannot carry on.”

She admitted it could take “years” for Iran to achieve democracy
but said “the Government can keep the people silent for a while longer through
weapons and repression, but this is not a long-term solution”.

Ebadi boarded a plane out of Tehran in the aftermath of the election, which
ignited the biggest outpouring of public protest since the 1979 revolution. As
the panic-stricken regime reacted brutally, rounding up students, journalists,
women’s rights activists and even clergymen, she travelled abroad and has not
been back since.

The Nobel laureate once discovered her own name on an execution list drawn
up by members of the Iranian regime. “But this is not the reason why I
don’t go back to Iran. Whenever I feel that I’m more useful inside Iran, that I
have the capacity to work there, I’ll go back.”

For the moment, she is focusing on raising awareness internationally. She
launched a campaign in Paris organised by the International Federation of Human
Rights to highlight the plight of 40 journalists, trade unionists and activists
currently in jail.

Ebadi sees hope in the weakness of the regime. She realised last month, she
said, how politically bruised it was when the corpses of five executed
political prisoners were buried in secret, as the Government feared the
funerals would spark a fresh wave of protests.

“A government that is scared by the dead bodies of their opponents is a
very weak power,” she said.

Iran’s future, she said, would be determined by many factors, including the
price of oil and the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan. “Iran is a fire
under the ashes. And nobody ever knows when the wind will blow the ashes
away.”

- INDEPENDENT

By Katherine Butler

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/iran/news/article.cfm?l_id=51&objectid=10651276

“Those who stand up for justice will always be on the right side of history.”

- Dr Martin Luther King


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.